Journal of Transformative Praxis

Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills
Rajendra Dahal 1 *
More Detail
1 Kathmandu University School of Education, Lalitpur, Nepal* Corresponding Author
Original Article

Journal of Transformative Praxis, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2023, 68-83, https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670

Online publication date: Aug 11, 2023

Publication date: Dec 31, 2023

Views: 80 | Downloads: 57

How to cite this article
APA
In-text citation: (Dahal, 2023)
Reference: Dahal, R. (2023). Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 4(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Dahal R. Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills. Journal of Transformative Praxis. 2023;4(1):68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Dahal R. Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills. Journal of Transformative Praxis. 2023;4(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
Chicago
In-text citation: (Dahal, 2023)
Reference: Dahal, Rajendra. "Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills". Journal of Transformative Praxis 2023 4 no. 1 (2023): 68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
Harvard
In-text citation: (Dahal, 2023)
Reference: Dahal, R. (2023). Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 4(1), pp. 68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
MLA
In-text citation: (Dahal, 2023)
Reference: Dahal, Rajendra "Autoethnographic reflections on navigating the path to empower teachers' transversal skills". Journal of Transformative Praxis, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, pp. 68-83. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.670
ABSTRACT
This inquiry portrays my experiences in enhancing teachers' transversal skills. As our national curriculum changed in 2019, my primary concern shifted to developing learners' transversal skills, but I was not aware of the way towards it. While working as a teacher educator, I could find teachers and teacher educators neglecting learners' transversal skills. Somehow, I have observed similar practices in my facilitation as well. As per the national curriculum on school education, teachers need to facilitate learners in such a way that contributes to developing learners' transversal skills (CDC, 2019, 2020, 2021a, 2021b). But without developing the transversal skills of teachers, can we develop the transversal skills of students? This question led me to observe my practices and practices of teachers. While going to my flash bag, I found that I primarily used a teacher-centered facilitation method similar to other teachers.. Studying STEAM at University became a turning point in my professional career where I felt a shift in my profession and this event became a pathway to shift my paradigm. I have used a multi-paradigmatic research design to present my shift and unfold my experiences. I have extended the investigation agenda using autoethnography and have introduced a sequence of lived experiences and discussions to highlight significant changes. I have completed my inquiry using the theory of transformative learning, constructivist learning, and STEAM-based pedagogical lens. The finding of this inquiry reveals that transversal skills can be developed through following the lens of STEAM education. We can create innovative pedagogy like "3C-R," which I have started by adding theories into practices.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1992). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley.
  2. Ashonibare, A. A. (2023). Doctoral education in Europe: Models and propositions for transversal skill training. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 14(2), 164-170.
  3. Boyd, R., & Myers, J. (1988). Transformative education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7(4), 261-284.
  4. Brookfield, S. (2003). Putting the critical back into critical pedagogy: A commentary on the path of dissent. Journal of transformative education, 1(2), 141-149.
  5. Cranton, P. (2005). Transformative learning. In L. M. English (Ed.), International encyclopedia of adult education (pp.630-637). Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Curriculum Development Centre (CDC). (2019). Curriculum of Basic Level (Grades 1-3), 2019. CDC, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur.
  7. Curriculum Development Centre (CDC). (2020). Curriculum of Basic Level (Class 6-8). CDC, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur.
  8. Curriculum Development Centre (CDC). (2021a). Curriculum of Basic Level (Class 4-5). CDC, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur.
  9. Curriculum Development Centre (CDC). (2021b). Curriculum of Basic Level (Class 9-10). CDC, Sanothimi, Bhaktapur.
  10. Dahal, R. (2018). Journey towards transformative teacher educator: An Auto-ethnographic inquiry [M Phil Dissertation]. Kathmandu University School of Education, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
  11. De Jager, P. (2001). Resistance to change: A new view of an old problem. The Futurist, 53(3), 24-27.
  12. Dewey, J. (1923). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
  13. Dochevska, Y. (2021). Defining Transversal skills: Perspectives and development. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 19(1), 621-625.
  14. Fallows, S. J., & Ahmet, K. (1999). Inspiring students: Case studies in motivating the learner. Psychology Press.
  15. Ge, X., Lfenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Moving forward with STEAM education research. In Emerging technologies for STEAM education (pp. 383-395). Springer.
  16. Grimes, B. (2007). Multidimensional classroom: development a comprehensive research base for Holistic education. University of Cambridge.
  17. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Heinemann.
  18. Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017, August). Developing 21st century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1868, No. 1, p. 030008). AIP Publishing LLC.
  19. Hoover, W. (1996). The practice implications of constructivism. SEDL Letter, 9(3).
  20. Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587-605.
  21. Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In Computer applications for security, control and system engineering (pp. 115-121). Springer.
  22. Lamsal, H. P. (2009). Local understanding and practices on scholarship management [Unpublished M Phil dissertation]. Kathmandu University School of education, Nepal.
  23. Lishchinsky, O. S. (2014), Simulation-based constructivist approach for education leaders. Journal of Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214543203
  24. Luitel, B. C. (2009). Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: A cultural-philosophical inquiry [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
  25. Luitel, B. C., Dahal, N., & Pant, B. P. (2022). Critical pedagogy: Future and hope. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 1-8.
  26. MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning. University of Toronto Press.
  27. Maeda, J. (2013). Stem+ art= steam. The STEAM journal, 1(1), 34.
  28. Mautner, T. (1996). A dictionary of philosophy. Blackwell Reference.
  29. McGrath, J. R. (2011). Linking pedagogical practices of activity-based teaching. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(3).
  30. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
  31. Mezirow, J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44, 222-232.
  32. Pant, B. P. (2015). Pondering on my beliefs and practices on mathematics, pedagogy, curriculum and assessment [Unpublished M Phil Dissertation]. Kathmandu University School of Education, Nepal.
  33. Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31-43.
  34. Piaget, J. (2003). Part I: Cognitive Development in Children-Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40.
  35. Psycharis, S. (2018). STEAM in education: A literature review on the role of computational thinking, engineering epistemology and computational science. computational steam pedagogy (CSP). Scientific Culture, 4(2), 51-72.
  36. Qutoshi, S. B. (2021). Journeying through informing, reforming, and transforming teacher education: Reflections on curriculum images. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 2(1), 8-18.
  37. Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum prospective, paradigm and possibilities. Macmillan.
  38. Taylor, P. C. (2014). Transformative education for sustainable future. Keynote paper presented at the 5th international ERT symposium on education for rural Transformation (September 17-19), Kathmandu University, Nepal.
  39. Tilea, M. (Ed.). (2015). Transversal skills development in modern teaching practice: A good practice guide. Pro Universitaria.
  40. Van Manen, M. (1991). The fact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Althouse Press.
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language-Revised edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  42. Wagle, S. K., Luitel, B. C., Krogh, E. (2023 in press). Exploring possibilities for participatory approaches to contextualized teaching and learning: A case from a public school in Nepal. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2183874
  43. Wilhelmson, L. (2006). Transformative learning in joint leadership. Journal of Workplace Learning, 78, 495-507. https://doi.org/101108/13665620610693042
LICENSE