Journal of Transformative Praxis

Journal of Transformative Praxis, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2023, 54-67, https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.575

Online publication date: Aug 11, 2023

Publication date: Dec 31, 2023

Views: 75 | Downloads: 70

This article aimed to explore teachers’ beliefs on reflective practice in their professional life and envision perspectives for transforming their practice. I used auto/ethnography as a research methodology for critically reflecting on the self and others’ lived experiences of teaching science, mathematics, and technology in the context of Nepal. I explored that reflective practice is required for understanding and transforming our deep-seated dominant cultural practices. On becoming a critically reflective practitioners, we can incorporate a trans-disciplinary STEAM approach while designing and implementing a curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment system that helps understand learners’ sociocultural backgrounds, beliefs, values, assumptions, and feelings for authentic, inclusive, and meaningful learning.

Reflective Practice Critical Reflection STEAM Approach Transformative Learning

1. Akella, D., Gibbs, A., Gilbert, B., Henry, & Lee, V., Mathis, D., & Williams, V., (2021). Critical reflection and communities of practice as professional development strategies for educators. International Journal for Cross-disciplinary Subjects in Education, 12 (1), 4339-4349.
2. Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phil Delta Kappan,76(8), 616-622.
3. Brookfield, S.D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
4. Brookfield, S.D. (2015). So what exactly is critical about critical reflection?. In J. Fook, V. Collington, F. Ross, G. Ruch and L. West (Eds.). Researching Critical Reflection and Research: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. (pp. 23-34). Routledge.
5. Connor, A.M., Karmokar, S. & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogies, 5(2), 37-47.
6. Dhungana, P., Luitel, B. C., Gjøtterud, S., & Wagle, S. K. (2021). Context-responsive Approaches of / for Teachers’ Professional Development: A Participatory Framework. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.18869
7. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
8. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge, and Human Interest. (J. J. Shapiro Trans.). Heinemann, London.
9. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol 2, Lifeworld and system -A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
10. Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: an international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153-179.
11. King, R. (1976). Bernstein's Sociology of the School: Some Propositions Tested. The British Journal of Sociology, 27(4), 430-443.
12. Kuit, J.A., Reay, G., & Freeman, R. (2001). Experiences of reflective teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2, 128-142.
13. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
14. Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293-307.
15. Luitel, B. C. (2012). A multi-paradigmatic approach to researching lived experiences in Mathematics education: contemplating possible connections. A paper from an International STEM Research Symposium WISDOMe Monograph# 3. University of Wyoming.
16. Luitel, B. C., &Taylor, P. C. (2019). Introduction: Research as transformative learning for sustainable futures. In Research as transformative learning for sustainable futures (pp. 1-16). Brill Sense.
17. Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 158-172.
18. Pant, B. P. (2017). Doing, teaching, learning, and thinking about mathematics- on becoming a transformative teacher. Journal of Education and Research,7(1), 11-24.
19. Qutoshi, S. B. (2015). Auto/ethnography: A transformative research paradigm. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 9, 161-190.
20. Rahmawati, Y., & Taylor, P.C. (2015). Moments of critical realization and appreciation: A transformative science educator reflects. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 31-42.
21. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516?529). Sage.
22. Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. Macmillan.
23. Shrestha, I. M., Luitel, B. C., & Pant, B. P. (2020, December). Exploring transformative pedagogy in teaching mathematics. In Mathematics Education Forum Chitwan (Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 9-16).
24. Stetsenko, A. (2017). Transformative activist stance: Encountering the future through commitment to change. Cambridge University Press.
25. Taylor, P.C. (2014). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 1-8). Springer.
26. Taylor, P.C. (2018). Enriching STEM with the arts to better prepare 21st century citizens. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers (ISET) 20017 (pp. 020002-1-020002-5), Phuket & Melville, NY.
27. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
28. Wagle, S. K., Luitel, B. C., & Krogh, E. (2019). Irrelevance of basic school education in Nepal: An anti-colonial critique on problems and prospects. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology And Anthropology, 13, 31-39 31.
29. Yusuf, M., Taylor, P. C., & Damanhuri, M. I. M. (2017). Designing critical pedagogy to counteract the hegemonic culture of the traditional chemistry classroom. Issues in Educational Research,27(1), 168-184.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.