Journal of Transformative Praxis

Journal of Transformative Praxis, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2021, 1-7, https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v2i1.530

Online publication date: Jun 30, 2021

Publication date: Dec 31, 2021

Views: 98 | Downloads: 110

Autoethnography covers a wide range of narrative representations, thereby bridging the gap of the boundaries by expressing autoethnographers’ painful and gainful lived experiences. These representations arise from local stories, vignettes, dialogues, and role plays by unfolding action, reaction, and interaction in the form of self-narration. Likewise, the autoethnographic texts must exhibit the autoethnographers’ critical reflections on the overall process of the inquiry. These exhibitions shall alert the autoethnographers’ research ethics, reflexivity, alternative modes of representation, inquiry, and storytelling. The original articles in this issue that rises from the domain of critical social theories within the various ranges of theoretical perspectives include journeying through informing, reforming, and transforming teacher education; critical ethnographic research tradition; a critical and political reading of the excerpts of myths; climate change education and its interface with indigenous knowledge and general traits of the participants as transformed teachers.

Autoethnography Narrative Vignette Critical Storytelling

1. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge.
2. Cranton, P., & King, K. P. (2003). Transformative learning as a professional development goal. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 98, 31-37.
3. Dale, J., & Hyslop-Margison, E. J. (2010). Paulo Freire: Teaching for freedom and transformation: The philosophical influences on the work of Paulo Freire (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
4. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589
5. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
6. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest. Heinemann.
7. Holman Jones, S. (2016). Living bodies of thought: The “critical” in critical autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(4), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415622509
8. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2^nd ed.) (pp. 279-313). Sage Publication.
9. Luitel, B. C. (2009). Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: A cultural-philosophical inquiry [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
10. Luitel, B. C., & Dahal, N. (2020). Conceptualising transformative praxis. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrtp.v1i1.31756
11. Luitel, B. C., & Taylor, P. C. (2019). Introduction: Research as transformative learning for sustainable futures. In Research as Transformative Learning for Sustainable Futures (pp. 1-16). Brill Sense.
12. Luitel, B. C., & Wagley, S. (2017). Transformative educational research: Fleshing out the concepts. Journal of Education and Research, 7(1), 1-10.
13. Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3-24.
14. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
15. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey Bass.
16. Montagud Mayor, X. (2016). Analytic or Evocative: A forgotten discussion in autoethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2432
17. Pant, B. P. (2015). Pondering on my beliefs and practices on mathematics, pedagogy, curriculum and assessment [Unpublished MPhil Dissertation]. Kathmandu University, Nepal.
18. Pant, B. P. (2019). An integral perspective on research: Methodological and theoretical journey of a teacher educator. In Research as Transformative Learning for Sustainable Futures (pp. 75-87). Brill Sense.
19. Pelias, R. J. (2003). The academic tourist: An autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 369-373.
20. Ploder, A., & Stadlbauer, J. (2016). Strong Reflexivity and its Critics: Responses to Autoethnography in the German-speaking cultural and social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 753–765. Pollock, D. (1998). Performing writing. The Ends of Performance, 73-103.
21. Qutoshi, S. (2015). Auto/ethnography: A transformative research paradigm. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 9, 161-190. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v9i0.14027
22. Shrestha, I. M. (2018). My pedagogical sensitisation towards holistic mathematics education: A practitioner’s inquiry [Unpublished MPhil Dissertation]. Kathmandu University, School of Education.
23. Sparkes, A. C. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 21-43.
24. Taylor, E. W. (2017). Transformative learning theory. In Transformative learning meets bildung (pp. 17-29). Brill Sense.
25. Taylor, P. C. (2013). Research as transformative learning for meaning-centred professional development. Meaning-centred education: International Perspectives and Explorations in Higher Education, 168-185.
26. Taylor, P. C. (2014). Contemporary qualitative research: Toward an integral research perspective. In N.G. Lederman & S.K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 38-54). Routledge.
27. Taylor, P.C., Taylor, E., & Luitel, B.C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In K. G. Tobin, B. J. Fraser & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 373- 387). Springer.
28. Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research. Sage.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.