Journal of Transformative Praxis

Journal of Transformative Praxis, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2024, 65-75, https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp/15755

Online publication date: Jul 04, 2024

Publication date: Dec 31, 2024

Views: 894 | Downloads: 139

Teaching has become one of the most complex professions globally due to the need for learners in the changing world. The current need of learners is focused on developing 21st-century skills rather than rote memorizing. However, in the case of Nepal, the pedagogical practice is still dominated by a teacher-centric approach focused on technical interests (For example, the Banking model, lecture method, and one-size-fits-all) in most schools. Thus, making learners passive and disengaged in the learning process. Hence, this paper aims to advocate for a shift in the pedagogical practices from technical to critical. Using autoethnography, I critically reflected on my 17 years of experience in education as a teacher, teacher educator, and school leader through the lens of Habermas’ theory of human interest and Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. My story is characterized by perseverance, self-realization, and transformation as I began to play the role of a change agent to advocate critical pedagogy. I have presented my stories in three sections with some art integration (Poem): 1. How I became a teacher, and what kept me going? 2. What poked me to change my despotic teaching self? 3. Why and how am I advocating critical pedagogy? This study recommends that all teachers and educators critically reflect on their practices to transform their pedagogical practices from teacher-centric to learner-centric and create a holistic learning environment.

Critical Self-reflection Transformative Teacher Autoethnography Reflection

1. Boyd, R. D. (2003). Facilitating personal transformations in small groups. In Personal Transformations in Small Groups (pp. 212-243). Routledge.
2. Caddell, M. (2006). Private schools as battlefields: Contested visions of learning and livelihood in Nepal. Compare, 36(4), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920601024909
3. Dewey, J. (1916). The democratic conception in education. In Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education, (pp. 87–107). Macmillan.
4. Ellis, C., & Adams, T. E. (2014). The purposes, practices, and principles of autoethnographic research. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, 254-276.
5. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589
6. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
7. Gardner, M. (2008). Transformative learning as a pedagogy of movement. In Narrating Transformative Learning in Education (pp. 11-30). Palgrave Macmillan US.
8. Grant, A. J., & Zeeman, L. (2012). Whose story is it? An autoethnography concerning narrative identity. The Qualitative Report, 17(36), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1735
9. Luitel, B. C., & Taylor, P. C. (2006). The Shanai, the pseudosphere and other imaginings, envisioning culturally contextualized mathematics education. Cultural Studies of Science, 2, 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9068-7
10. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
11. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1997(74), 5-12. https://profilpelajar.com/article/Transformative_learning
12. Pant, B. P. (2017). Doing, teaching, learning and thinking about mathematics–On becoming a transformative teacher. Journal of Education and Research, 7(1), 11-24. https://kusoed.edu.np/journal/index.php/je/article/view/223
13. Phyak, P. (2016). Local-global tension in the ideological construction of English language education policy in Nepal. In English language education policy in Asia (pp. 199-217). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_9
14. Singleton, J. (2015). Head, heart and hand model for transformative learning: place as context for changing sustainability values. J Sustain Educ. http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/?s=%22social+sciences%22+%22higher+education%22
15. Stewart, M. (2021). Understanding learning: Theories and critique. In University teaching in focus (pp. 3-28). Routledge.
16. Sunar, P.K. (2022). My Transformative Journey from a despotic teacher to a healer educator/leader: An auto/ethnography. Proceeding of the Third International Conference on Transformative Education Research and Sustainable Development (TERSD-2022) (pp. 337-340). https://tersd2022.kusoed.edu.np/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Proceedings-TERSD-2022_3-Novemeber-2022.pdf
17. Taylor, P. C., & Medina, M. (2011). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to pluralism. College Research Journal, 1(1), 1-16. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Educational-research-paradigms-From-positivism-to/991005540537707891
18. Taylor, P. C., & Taylor, E. (2019). Transformative STEAM education for sustainable development. In Empowering science and mathematics for global competitiveness (pp. 125-131). CRC Press.van
19. Virkkunen, E. (2021). Head, Heart, and Hands: exploring art education for the individual and community (Master's thesis). University of Jyväskylä.
20. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

I want to acknowledge that a specific part of this paper was presented at the 3rd International Conference on Transformative Educational Research and Sustainable Development (4-6 November 2022). Also, I am grateful to my mentors, Prof Bal Chandra Luitel, Niroj Dahal, and Indra Mani Yamphu, for motivating and guiding me in shaping this paper.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.